Woohooo -- finding the cool sites this week! First, an online journal that hits close to home. Then (thanks to one of my employers, I can read the Chronicle of Higher Education online, to see what interesting things the government has planned. New attacks on us liberal college intellectuals, apparently. That's kind of funny, seeing as how most of my fully-employed grad school friends (like this guy and this guy) are all pretty conservative. But hey -- what can we expect from a man who acts as though a "C" average means that his education was worth anything?

Still, all these exciting happenings in the hell of adjunct world are nothing compared to THE BEST of all -- the hell of Bad Baby Names!! What are these people thinking???

SquawkBox again not working ... ok -- it is now -- please someone else leave a comment, so I can test ...

Ok -- thought it was working correctly. We'll see. Happy to say that the ever-awful Tim Eyman got no ballot initiatives in this year. So you know, Tim Eyman is to me the antithesis of everything the founding fathers wanted. His entire raison d'etre seems to be to do end-runs around the people elescted by a majority and get taxes abolished. Good for him -- he's already had to fess up to the public about embezzling from his first non-profit -- and now he's soliciting donations for his legal defense fund. What a jerk. This is where one wishes instant karma were part of the Gospels. Don't know what Jesus would drive, but Tim Eyman drives a big-ass SUV. He even convinced the taxpayers of Washington State to repeal most of the tag fees on car registrations -- flat rate now, folks. Apparently, Mr. Eyman and his ilk have somehow convinced folks that graduated taxes hurt the little guy. Just one word here -- "Bastards."

Oh Joy -- my comments are now working. Firmly resolve to blog more -- especially as I am now discovering more to blog about.

Ok -- Squawkbox doesn't work. Still working on it. Also using a crap book for a Summer World History course. Guess which one!

Well, I'm not sure about the "powered by squawk box tv" thing -- it doesn't seem to be working. Oh well -- blogging more later, I suppose. Oh -- and memo to all -- the WIkipedia is no longer one of my recommended sites. It's a great concept -- an open content encyclopedia. However, there is a great tendency for people with expertise in a subject to be "shouted down" by people who know "the Truth". More importantly, there are articles on the site that might be age-inappropriate for kids -- or that one might feel uncomfortable if one's parents were to stumble across. A debate is currently raging over whether to put a neutral advisory on the site's main page, and the "all information is equal and advisories are a form of censorship" brigade looks to be winning. Mrs. Thatcher once said there was no such thing as society. The Wikipedia seems bound and determined to prove her right and 4500 years of human history wrong. Bastards.

I have blogged since last week -- really! Something went very wrong, though on my post on the new weird Matrix Reloaded links to Michael Baigent's Holy Blood, Holy Grail by way of a character called The Merovingian. I have to say, this is too odd -- except, of course that it's almost commonplace these days. After all, you can find out about this particular esoteric conspiracy theory (Merovingians, Jesus, and the Templars) via Sierra's Gabriel Knight 3:Blood of the Sacred, Blood of the Damned. Or, you can read Katherine Kurtz's fantasy novels about modern Templars, or her "how the Templars and the Loch Ness Monster put the Bruce on the Scottish throne" books. Great fun, but then, I don't believe in any conspiracy theories except the one where historians are kept from teaching History because a Vast Government Conspiracy wants to keep the same old folks in power by convincing the public that History isn't important. Give me a full-time (or even tenure-track) job, and maybe I'll stop believing this!

Oh -- I'm trying a New comment thingie. 'Scuse, please, if it takes a bit to work out the bugs!

I have clearly not been in blogging mode lately. Perhaps I should leave this on in the background? Since last I blogged, many things have happened -- or at least, I've become aware of them. The most interesting to me is still the Traditional Catholic Church that Mel Gibson is building. Call me crazy, but if you want to be a traditional Catholic, shouldn't you be going back to, Constantinople? Or maybe Nicaea? I may be crap at being a Papist, but Trent seems an interesting choice. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Trent strengthen the idea of obedience to the Pope? But, as you can see, it's not really about the important things like doctrine -- at least to some folks. It's about appearances. I'm with the
the Cranky Professor on Denny's architecture and penitential guitar mass, but isn't there something fundamentally post-Vatican II about a bunch of lay people deciding that they know better? Is this what people mean by "How Ironic"?

Well, I have to say, my mind has been changed. At the University where I sometimes teach there is a modern chapel dedicated to St. Ignatius, that I thought was awful. My colleagues have changed my mind. We went in the other night after a very nice lecture on the Pilgrimage to Compostela, and the chapel was lovely. A wonderful, serene, space, lit from all sorts of interesting angles, some of the lights colored. A person could happily go to mass there.

FINALLY back to blogging, I hope! The Cranky Professor has been blogging, even though in Rome, and I feel the need to catch up. I'm happy to announce to all of you non-Washingtonians that the (in my own opinion, to which I am entitled) Spawn of Satan known as Tim Eyman has lost at least the first major round in his campaign to undermine the ideals of representative democracy. Meanwhile, it's not just the schools in Germany that are having trouble. (Dinner calls -- to be continued ... )

Well -- just thought I'd mention how nice it is to have a Leader of the Free World who can't bloody pronounce the word, "nuclear." On the other hand, maybe Saddam Hussein really has a new Nook-You-Lur weapon, and we should be afraid. It would be nice if Dubya would stop talking to the lowest common denominator -- it makes it sort of pointless for me to try to teach if one can be president and talk like an illiterate...

Speaking of teaching, keep an eye out for my next rant...it will be on the horrors of part-time employment. At least, it will be on that subject if I can figure out how to teach four classes and still blog. But just so you know, I'd have to work this same load every quarter AND summer, just to meet what I made in private industry -- and I'm not in the Sciences! Oh, well...back to the grind. Thank goodness I have many lovely students this term. .

Jeepers -- It's been a while, hasn't it? One would think quitting the Wikipedia would have given me more time to blog. I suppose it has, except that I'm madly preparing for this quarter's courses. And painting. And trying to get the yard ready for Autumn.
Meanwhile, the NFL season has begun. This is not a particularly big thing for me -- I don't care all that much about which overpaid athletes win. On the other hand, it is Football Season, where Football = Association Football, i.e., soccer. This is a good thing, if only because the football news is generally fun to read. I'm looking for fun these days -- especially as we come up on what is bound to be one of the worst days of the year (Da-Da-DUUUUMMM!!!) The Media Anniversary of 9/11.
It's not that I think the day should pass without some kind of memorial. In fact, I'm planning on attending Mass here, where I teach. Apparently, there will also be a Requiem concert at Safeco Field and another concert at Benaroya Hall. These types of things are fine, I think. But to me, the hype that the media have begun (broadcasting LIVE from event x) is fairly disgusting. If anything, one would think that the day be spent in reflection. Or maybe in getting on with one's life. Instead, we'll be treated to another self-indulgent orgy of ME, ME, ME --

"where were you, sir, when you heard the news?" "Well, I was in the middle of ordering a Grande, non-fat, hazelnut double shot latte...?" "And how did you feel when you heard the news?" Y'all know the rest ...

I'll be very surprised if we see any real news. There will be no answers to questions about whether attitutes towards the US and her policies have changed, no updates on the people being held in Guantanamo Bay -- what is their legal status? Instead, we can celebrate the incredibly badly titled Patriot Day. You can even buy a recording of the Patriots Day Anthem -- two new (and in my opinion embarassingly bad) verses to be added to the Star Spangled Banner.
Call me silly, but I don't think that the people who died that day died for their country. I don't think their deaths were patriotic in the least. Most of them were people in the wrong place at the wrong time. They didn't have a choice, and I'd bet that, given a choice, most of the people on those planes and in the WTC would have chosen not to participate. As for the people who had the choice -- the people on flight 93 (sort of), the emergency and rescue personnel (or whatever we call cops, firemen, EMTs, etc.), the normal folks who jumped into the fray to help out -- did they help for America? I think not. I certainly hope not. They were just good people, doing what good people (especially those who make it their profession) do. I'd be surprised if they thought, "Hey, there are American lives at stake -- I must do something!" I think it far more likely that they went in to save people, regardless of citizenship. So I think it appalling, disgusting, and tragic that their deaths, which in many cases were simply heroic, be used to fuel another spate of meaningless flag-waving. Should a day when tragedy brought out the kind of good and selflessness in people that transcends silly earthly concerns really be used to rally a nation into an "us vs. them" mentality? To ask a question that many in the current administration appear to hold dear, "What would Jesus think?"
I wonder..

Is it just me, or are there tons of Catholic blogs out there? Does anyone know why? I'd ask you to comment, but I haven't got that particular technology yet. You can e-mail me, though. It's a very strange thing... do Catholics have more time? I certainly enjoy many of the sites, especially Catholic Light and Holy Weblog. Me, I'm a fairly secular Papist. Probably comes from the anti-organized religion upbringing. That, and I live with (in a non-canonical but legal marriage, thank you) a lapsed Catholic. His idea of being a good Catholic seems to be based on the pre-Vatican II Church in which he was raised. Still, I try to do my part -- at least my students at the state schools come out of freshman history knowing that Catholics are Christians, that Jesus was raised a Jew, and that, for a very long time, to be a Christian west of the Adriatic pretty much meant being a Catholic (or a heretic). Not a bad thing in a state where a very large number of kids come straight to college as Running Start students, after being home-schooled for (usually) religious reasons. Needless to say, there aren't a lot of Catholics being home-schooled -- that's why there are parochial schools.. Plus, once one gets to high school age (in Seattle, at least), the schools with the best reputations for college prep are Holy Names Academy -- all girls, and Seattle Prep -- co-ed and Jesuit. So, in a weird twist of fate or individual rights politics, there are a lot of kids out there getting pretty Conservative Christian educations for the first 10 or so years, and then thrown into a diverse, multicultural world. Talk about culture shock!

Back to Blogging.. Or, Blogging -- because I have way more to do than I can manage, so why not do more? But seriously, I've been catching up on my mail -- actually reading my listserve newsletters, etc. It was somewhat refreshing to find that it isn't just NPR that worries about the erosion of civil rights in our post 9/11 world. Mind you, I think Zacharias Moussaoui is pretty much guilty as hell -- partially because the papers say he says so -- but I think it's more important now than ever that th US uphold the constitution it claims to be defending. So maybe it's good that John Barnhill is worried about the Sixth Amendment. Frankly, I worry any time someone tells me criticizing the government is Unamerican. Me, I figure it's my job.

Aha -- just caught up with last week's news. There I was, thinking that the somewhat ridiculous Cynthia McKinney (just because I'm a left-wing type doesn't mean I've lost my mind -- she's a Politician, and appears to have crossed the fine line between being a representative and wanting to win at any cost) was the most important news in Georgia. Then I came across this little tidbit in the New York Times: apparently that forward-thinking County of Cobb (home of the Big Chicken, I believe) feels the need to point out that "Evolution is just a theory". This drives me crazy. How dare people think that they can limit what God can or cannot do, and how dare they expect that those limits are in one humanly fallible book? Of course, these are often the same people who call themselves Christians but focus on the Old Testament -- which confuses me, maybe because, if the Incarnation is crucial to being Christian, don't you want to pay more attention to what Jesus purportedly said? But I digress. Oh wait -- this whole thing is a digression, isn't it?br
But back to McKinney. I suppose she wanted the intelligence failures to have been deliberate cover-ups for a couple of reasons. First, she hates the current administration. Second, it means she can blame somebody -- any lots of people need to blame so that they can have...what's the word? Oh -- "Closure." Frankly, I think it's just because our intelligence agencies aren't. They are Balkanized and populated by a lot of not-necessarily well-educated military folks. Not that being in the military denotes lack of education, mind. But think of the people who formed the backbone of the intelligence community during the Second World War -- lots of academics who were helping to defend and support a cause. Nowadays, I get the feeling that academics aren't welcome because we've actually read the constitution and -- gasp -- ask questions. So, I suppose what I'm saying is that, where McKinney sees intent, I see a design flaw.

Hmmm. That wasn't the cheery blog I'd planned. Oh well -- maybe a break will perk things up.

Well, apparently this is a weekly blog -- or so it seems. Many important things have been happening, though.. One of my personal heroes, Tony Adams, has decided to retire. A loss for the Gunners, but a good plan for our favourite donkey. In perhaps more important news, I've been informed by yet another History department that there's a budget crunch on. Could this perhaps have something to do with Washington state's own permanently offensive Tim Eyman? In a way, I suspect. Eyman is one of those people who gets voters to believe he's helping them, while he's secretly helping them take one in the shorts. For those of you who don't live in Washington, you should know we don't pay income tax here. We just get nickeled and dimed to death with sales taxes, use taxes, etc. Eyman and his group (from which he embezzeled thousands of dollars) are interesting, because they claim to be 'for the little guys' and "a grass-roots movement." If you ask me, they're downright Un-American. You see, when I grew up, back when schools had funding, we learned about representative democracy. The theory was, you elected legislators who would represent the interests of your community. If your elected representative didn't represent you, you voted the bastard out! Eyman and co. believe that we should run everything via initiative. Basically, this means that people who don't have the time to really look into issues vote their wallets -- and then bitch about the reduced services they're getting from government. Eyman himself doesn't want the responsibility of being in office -- oh -- and his "grass-roots" group? They hire people to collect signatures. Not really very grass roots.
What does this have to do with history departments? Well, Washingtonians are an interesting group. They regularly vote to lower taxes and increase spending. The government will of course "reduce waste" and everything will come out even. The sad fact is that the Washington state community colleges charge (no joke!) about $700 PER QUARTER for in-state tuition. These are community colleges, folks, not universities. You remember, places where people can afford tuition? When budget crunches hit, they hit schools. That's how it is. This is at a time when enrollments are up and rising every year. Now you know why I'd rather just read the football news.

What I've been reading and doing this summer... A friend of mine sent me a great book, Debra Ginsberg's Waiting, which is a wonderful explanation of the restaurant server mentality. No one can understand why I have always enjoyed working in restaurants -- except other servers! What really astounds people is how many food servers have advanced degrees. Ginsberg explains it all, in a way that is heartbreakingly familiar.

For a novel, I've been reading one of the loveliest books ever -- Ursula Hegi's Stones From the River. There's nothing I can say except that the language is wonderful, the characters interesting, if not always appealing, and it's set in Germany from end of the First World War through the end of the Second. It's been especially nice, since I tend to be a lazy reader, and gravitate more towards Terry Pratchett, for which I make no apologies, and Elizabeth Peters, a truly guilty pleasure. Speaking of guilty pleasures, I managed to read two books this summer that dovetailed right into a computer game I bought -- more on Knights Templar, dead Merovingians, and bad conspiracy theory later.

Well -- Finally got the template set up the way I think I might like it...although I can't figure out how to put in a place for comments. Just in case you're wondering, I am another blogging medievalist. I teach at several colleges, including this one, this one, and sometimes here as well. There are lots of blogging medievalists, so why not one more?

background